Reynolds v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court Mar 26, 1885 No. No. 9968Published
Synopsis
Divorce—Judgment for Attorneys’ Fees—Prohibition.—The enforcement of a provision in a judgment of divorce requiring defendant to pay counsel fees to plaintiff’s attorneys cannot be restrained by a writ of prohibition, although the judgment was one of dismissal entered by consent of the parties.
By the COURT. Application for writ of prohibition. We see no ground for granting the writ prayed for in this case. The application is therefore denied.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)