Estate of Crozier

California Supreme Court Jun 30, 1884 No. No. 9145Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed an order amending a judgment to specify that costs be paid in due course of administration pursuant to section 1332 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Issues

Whether the court erred in amending a judgment to direct that costs be paid in due course of administration.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“the court made an order amending the judgment as to costs, directing the same to be paid in due course of administration: Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1332.”

“It does not appear that any error was committed.”

Synopsis

Costs—Amendment of Judgment.—No Error Appearing from the transcript on appeal, the order amending judgment as to costs is affirmed.

By the COURT. The court entered judgment May 29, 1883. On the 13th of June, 1883, the court made an order amending the judgment as to costs, directing the same to be paid in due course of administration: Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1332. It does not appear that any error was committed. For aught that appears in the transcript, due notice of motion to amend was given and hearing had thereon.

Order affirmed.

More from California Supreme Court

People v. Wende (1979)
People v. Watson (1956)
People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
People v. Kelly (2006)
Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
People v. Lewis (2021)
In Re Estrada (1965)
Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
People v. Marsden (1970)

Related research