In re Lowenthal (1884) · DecisionDepot

In re Lowenthal

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

California Supreme Court Apr 29, 1884 No. No. 8559Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to justify the removal or suspension of the attorney, resulting in the dismissal of the charges.

Issues

Whether the evidence presented in the proceeding is sufficient to justify the removal or suspension of the attorney.

Disposition. Dismissed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“We have examined the evidence in the case, and do not find it sufficient to justify a removal or suspension of Mr. Lowenthal, and the charges are therefore dismissed.”

Synopsis

Attorney—Disbarment.—Evidence Held Insufficient to justify the defendant’s removal or suspension from practice at the bar as an attorney and counselor.

By the COURT. This is a proceeding, under section 287 and following sections of the Code of Civil Procedure, to remove or suspend an attorney and counselor of this court. The accusation was made in due form, and, being wholly denied, a reference was made under section 298 to William Craig, Esq. Mr. Craig has. filed his report, accompanied by the evidence taken by him in support of the accusation, as well as that produced by the defense. We have examined the evidence in the case, and do not find it sufficient to justify a removal or suspension of Mr. Lowenthal, and the charges are therefore dismissed.

In re Lowenthal

AI Brief

Synopsis

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief