Lomax v. Cooper

California Supreme Court Jul 11, 1864 No. No. 225Published

Before: Currey, Sanderson, Sawyer, Shafter

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the evidence in the record fully supported the referee's findings.

Issues

Whether the referee's findings were contrary to the evidence.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“We have carefully read all the evidence contained in the record and are satisfied that it fully sustains the finding.”

Synopsis

APPEAL from Twelfth Judicial District, San Francisco County.

SANDERSON, C. J. This action was brought to enjoin the defendants from removing a building from a lot in the city of San Francisco alleged to belong to the plaintiff. The case was tried by a referee who found the facts and reported a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal.

[148]The only point made by counsel for appellants is that the finding of the referee is contrary to the evidence. We have carefully read all the evidence contained in the record and are satisfied that it fully sustains the finding.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Currey, J.; Sawyer, J.; Shafter, J.

More from California Supreme Court

People v. Wende (1979)
People v. Watson (1956)
People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
People v. Kelly (2006)
Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
People v. Lewis (2021)
In Re Estrada (1965)
Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
People v. Marsden (1970)

Related research