Valentine v. Doane (1860) · DecisionDepot

Valentine v. Doane

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

California Supreme Court Jul 5, 1860 No. No. 2522Published

Before: Baldwin, Cope

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment because the case involved only a question of fact regarding the possession and ownership of vegetables, which had been resolved by the referee and upheld by the district court.

Issues

Whether the appellate court should review a judgment based on a question of fact where there was conflicting testimony.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“This record involves merely a question of fact as to the possession and ownership of certain vegetables”

“It is unnecessary to appeal to us in such cases, as we have often held.”

Synopsis

APPEAL from Fourth Judicial District, San Francisco County.

BALDWIN, J. This record involves merely a question of fact as to the possession and ownership of certain vegetables, as to both of which facts there was testimony direct and inferential on both sides. The referee made his report after hearing and seeing the witnesses, the most important of whom were Foueguera, and the district court refused to set aside the verdict.

It is unnecessary to appeal to us in such cases, as we have often held.

The judgment is affirmed.

I concur: Cope, J.

Valentine v. Doane

AI Brief

Synopsis

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief