Stitt v. Stitt

California Supreme Court Feb 13, 1936 No. L. A. No. 15376Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court granted the respondent's motion for diminution of the record to include a trial court order correcting typographical errors in the original findings.

Issues

Whether the record on appeal should be supplemented with a trial court order correcting typographical errors in the findings.

Disposition. Granted

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“It sufficiently appears that the correction was properly made by the lower court, and that it is necessary to a complete understanding of the record that the order making the corrections be now brought up and made a part of the record on appeal.”

“The motion for diminution is therefore granted.”

THE COURT. Respondent has moved for a diminution of the record in order to bring before this court an order, made by the trial court subsequent to the filing of the transcript here, correcting certain typographical errors which occurred in the findings as originally signed.

[330]It sufficiently appears that the correction was properly made by the lower court, and that it is necessary to a complete understanding of the record that the order making the corrections be now brought up and made a part of the record on appeal.

The motion for diminution is therefore granted.

Stitt v. Stitt

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief