Schiller v. City of Glendale

California Supreme Court Dec 5, 1929 No. L. A. No. 10099Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment for the defendants, holding that the case is controlled by the decision in Woodill v. City of Glendale.

Issues

Whether the street improvement proceedings in this case are governed by the legal principles established in Woodill v. City of Glendale.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“This cause refers to the same street improvement proceedings and is in every respect, both as to the facts and as to the law involved, identical with and controlled by case No. 10085, Woodill v. City of Glendale”

“the judgment herein, which passed for defendants upon the sustaining of their demurrers, without leave to amend, is hereby affirmed.”

THE COURT. — This cause refers to the same street improvement proceedings and is in every respect, both as to the facts and as to the law involved, identical with and controlled by case No. 10085, Woodill v. City of Glendale, ante, p. 564 [282 Pac. 797], this day decided. Upon authority of that case, for all the reasons set forth therein and upon the same grounds, the judgment herein, which passed for defendants upon the sustaining of their demurrers, without leave to amend, is hereby affirmed.

Schiller v. City of Glendale

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief