Morrissey v. Hammon (1911) · DecisionDepot

Morrissey v. Hammon

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

California Supreme Court Jul 31, 1911 No. Sac. No. 1868Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment and order appealed from, finding the questions involved identical to those decided in the companion case of Morrissey et al. v. Gray et al. (Sac. No. 1825).

Issues

Whether the questions involved in this appeal are identical to those decided in Morrissey et al. v. Gray et al. (Sac. No. 1825).

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The questions involved upon this appeal are identical with those considered and decided in Sae. No. 1825. For the reasons therein given the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.”

Synopsis

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court’ of Butte County and from an order refusing a new trial. K. S. Mahon, Judge presiding.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Morrissey v. Gray, ante, p. 390.

THE COURT. The appellants upon this appeal are the same as those in Morrissey et al. v. Gray et al., (Sac. No. 1825), ante, p. 390. The respondent upon this appeal, W. P. Hammon, holds title from defendant John C. Gray, through mesne conveyance, to a portion of the Morrissey Ranch not affected by the homestead. The questions involved upon this appeal are identical with those considered and decided in Sae. No. 1825. For the reasons therein given the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Hearing in Bank denied.

Morrissey v. Hammon

AI Brief

Synopsis

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief