Keyes v. Cyrus
Before: Beatty, Harrison
Synopsis
Estates of Deceased Persons—Probate Homestead—Exemption from Forced Sale—Debts of Widow.—A homestead set apart to the widow of a decedent by the probate court, under the provisions of section 1405 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is exempt from forced sale for her debts contracted previous to the death of her husband as well as for his debts.
Id.—Object of Homestead Law.-—The object of the homestead law is to protect the family in the right to preserve their home, and it will be assumed that any legislation upon the subject of the homestead is intended for its protection, and that when the legislature has made provision for setting apart a homestead out of the property of a decedent, it was its intention that it should be exempt from forced sale.
Id.—Remedial Statutes—Liberal Construction.—Homestead statutes being remedial in their nature are to he construed liberally and in favor of carrying out the manifest purpose of the legislature, rather than that their operation be restricted to the strict letter in which they are framed.
Id.—Construction of Codes. —Section 1240 of the Civil Code, which declares that “the homestead is exempt from execution or forced sale, except as in this title provided,” is not in terms limited to the homestead selected by the parties, hut applies to every homestead, whether selected and recorded by the voluntary act of the parties or by an order of the probate court under the provisions of section 1465 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Opinion — Harrison
Harrison, J. July 22, 1889, M. M. Keyes and Barbara Keyes, his wife, made their promissory note to John Cyrus for seven thousand one hundred and seventy-five dollars, and as security for its payment executed to him a mortgage upon certain lands in Sonoma county. M. M. Keyes died October 17,1889, and his widow Barbara was appointed administratrix of his estate and continued to act as such until August 10, 1891, when her final accounts were settled, and she was discharged [323]from her trust. No homestead had been selected in the lifetime of said Keyes, and on June 30, 1890, the superior court for Sonoma county upon due proceedings had therefor, by its order made that day, set apart as a homestead for the use of the said Barbara certain lands belonging to the estate of said Keyes other than those included in the mortgage, and on the 7th of July a copy of the said order was recorded in the office of the county recorder. The property so set apart as a homestead was community property of the said Barbara and her husband, and he left no minor children surviving him. At the time the land was set apart to her Barbara was residing thereon, and continued to reside there until December 17, 1891, when she conveyed the premises to the plaintiffs. After the death of Keyes, Cyrus presented to the administratrix a claim against his estate upon the note and mortgage, which was duly allowed and approved, and thereafter, in an action instituted in the said superior court for the foreclosure of the mortgage, a judgment was rendered against said Barbara as administratrix, and also individually, for the amount of the note, and directing a sale of the mortgaged premises and the application of the proceeds thereof upon the judgment, and, if there should be any deficiency, that it should be docketed against said Barbara. Under this judgment the mortgaged lands were sold June 15, 1891, and the proceeds being insufficient to satisfy the judgment, the deficiency thereof, amounting to three thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight dollars, was docketed against Barbara on the 16th of June, 1891. January 5, 1892, the defendants herein, to whom Cyrus had assigned his judgment, caused an execution to be issued on this deficiency judgment and placed in the hands of the sheriff, under which he levied upon the lands that had been set apart to Barbara, and was advertising the same for sale when the plaintiffs brought this action to restrain the said sale. Judgment was rendered in their favor, and the defendants have appealed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)