Ex Parte Heylman
Synopsis
Application to the Supreme Court for a discharge upon a writ of habeas corpus.
The petitioner was convicted in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco for peddling meat from a vehicle without a license, in violation of ordinance 1589 of the city and county of San Francisco, as amended by ordinance 2216. Ordinance 1589 provided for the licensing of peddlers of meat, fish, vegetables, fruit, game, poultry, etc., at the rate of ten dollars per quarter, and made it a misdemeanor to violate the ordinance. Ordinance 2216, amending ordinance 1589, provided that the rate of license should be, “ for peddlers of meat from vehicles or baskets, seventy-five dollars ($75) per quarter,” and for peddlers of fish, vegetables, fruit, game, poultry, etc., named, from vehicles or baskets, ten dollars per quarter.
The Court. Ordinances similar to that which petitioner was convicted of having violated have frequently-been considered by this court. The validity of such ordinances is not now an open question here.
We are unable to discover any legal ground upon which the petitioner could be discharged.
Petitioner remanded to the custody of the chief of police of the city and county of San Francisco.
Be Haven, J., and Beatty, C. J., dissented.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)