Broughton v. Vasquez
Before: Belcher, Foote, Searls, Temple, Thornton
Synopsis
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County, and from an order refusing a new trial.
The facts are stated in the opinion in Department Two.
The Court. —The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed for the reasons given in the former opinion rendered by Department Two.
Thornton, J., and Temple, J., dissented. The following is the opinion of Department Two above referred to, rendered on the 21st of September, 1886: —
Searls, C. — This action is brought by the plaintiff, as assignee in insolvency of Felix Anaya, to set aside a deed of conveyance executed by the latter to defendant on the ninth day of July, 1884, of certain lots of land in the town of Modesto, Stanislaus County.
Defendant had judgment, from which, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the plaintiff appeals.
Prior to February 27, 1884, there had been business transactions between the insolvent, Anaya, and defendant, Vasquez, on account of which there was a balance of several thousand dollars due and owing from the former to the latter, and which was secured by a conveyance from the former to the wife of the latter of the lots of land here in question, and of other property.
On the last-mentioned day, the parties had a settlement, and Anaya paid to Vasquez fourteen hundred dollars, leaving a balance due the latter of fifteen hundred dollars, for which sum Anaya gave him his promissory note.
The wife of Vasquez, at the same time, conveyed to Anaya all the property theretofore standing in her ñamé as aforesaid, upon a verbal agreement that Anaya, upon [327]going home to Modesto, would execute and deliver to Vasquez, as security for the payment of the promissory note, a deed of conveyance of the two lots of land, the-subject-matter of this action.
Anaya neglected to execute and deliver the deed until the ninth day of July, 1884, when he executed and delivered it to Vasquez, pursuant to his agreement, and as security for the payment of the promissory note.
A few days before the deed was delivered, the buildings upon the lots were consumed by fire; and Anaya at the date of the delivery of such deed was insolvent, and unable to pay his debts.
On the fifth day of August, 1884, and within thirty days after the execution and delivery of the last-mentioned deed, Anaya filed in the Superior Court in and for the county of Stanislaus his petition in insolvency, and thereupon such proceedings were had that he was duly adjudged an insolvent, and the plaintiff herein was duly appointed his assignee.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)