Faris v. Lampson (1887) · DecisionDepot

Faris v. Lampson

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

California Supreme Court Aug 16, 1887 No. No. 11892Published

Before: Belcher, Foote, Hayne

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment because the appellants failed to file points or authorities or present oral argument to identify alleged errors.

Issues

Whether a judgment should be affirmed when appellants fail to file points or authorities or present oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“having thus omitted to point out the errors of which they complain, the judgment should be affirmed without an examination of the record.”

Synopsis

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County.

The facts are stated, in the opinion.

Foote, C. — In this case no oral argument was had, nor did the appellants file any points or authorities; and having thus omitted to point out the errors of which they complain, the judgment should be affirmed without an examination of the record. (Mokelumne H. C. M. Co. v. Woodbury, 10 Cal. 188; Edmondson v. Alameda Co., 24 Cal. 350; Holm v. Roach, 25 Cal. 37; Hickinbotham v. Monroe, 28 Cal. 489; Brewster v. Johnson, 51 Cal. 222; Estate of Montgomery, 59 Cal. 583.)

Belcher, C. C., and Hayne, C., concurred. The Court. — For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, judgment affirmed.

Faris v. Lampson

AI Brief

Synopsis

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief