Mullally v. Irish-American Benevolent Society

Belcher, C. C. The court below struck out the defendant’s memorandum of costs, and whether it erred in so doing or not is the only question presented for decision.

It appears from the bill of exceptions that the case was tried by the court, and its findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed with the clerk on the twenty-third day of May, 1882. The decision was in favor of the defendant, and on the third day of August following the plaintiff served upon the defendant’s attorney and filed a notice of intention to move for a new trial, designating therein as the grounds for the motion “the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the findings and decision, and that the decision is against law,” and also that the motion would be made upon a statement of the case.

The plaintiff also on the same day served on the defendant’s attorney her proposed statement of the case, and specified therein the particulars in which the evidence was alleged to be insufficient to justify the decision.

To this statement the defendant prepared amendments, which were served on the plaintiff’s attorney on the eleventh day of September.

The statements and amendments were presented to the judge of the court for settlement, and after a prolonged hearing, in which defendant’s attorney took an active part, the statement was settled and allowed on the fourteenth day of October. The motion for new trial was argued, submitted, and denied on the twenty-seventh day of October, both parties by their attorneys participating in the argument. Judgment was entered in pursuance of the decision, and more than five months after the decision was filed, on the ninth day of November, and on the fourteenth day of that month the de[561]fendant served and filed its memorandum of costs. On motion of plaintiff the court struck out this memorandum of costs, upon the ground that it was not filed within the time required by law, and the defendant appealed from the order.

Was the cost bill filed in time? It is claimed for the appellant that it was, because, first, it was filed on the fifth day after the judgment was entered, and second, that no notice of the decision was ever served by the plaintiff on the defendant or its attorney, and the defendant was not required t.o file its cost bill until such notice was given.

Section 1033 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides as follows:—