M. Cerf v. Otis Ashley

McKinistby, J. —■ The action is to foreclose a mortgage, executed May 13, 1878, by Otis and Sarah A. Ashley, to secure their promissory note of even date therewith.

It is claimed by appellants that the mortgagees had no interest in the note and mortgage when the action was commenced.

On the 19th December, 1878, the mortgagees assigned to “E. L. Williams, trustee for E. H. Watson,” the said note and mortgage of defendants Otis and Sarah Ashley, to secure the payment of a note of the mortgagees (Cerf, Blockman, and Blum).

The original complaint was filed November 6,1879, by Cerf, Blockman, and Blum, and contained no reference to their transaction with Williams.

[420]January 29, 1880, an amended complaint was filed, with leave of the court, and with the consent of Williams (who verified the same), in which E. L. Williams, trustee, is made co-plaintiff with the original plaintiffs. The amended complaint sets forth the assignment to Williams, and that the same was as security for the payment to him of the note of Cerf, Blockman, and Blum.

Williams might properly have been joined as plaintiff in the original complaint, the suit being in equity. “All persons having an interest in the subject-matter and in the relief demanded may be joined as plaintiffs, except when otherwise provided in this title." (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 378.)

The code allows, in case of a transfer of a part of the subject-matter, the transferee to be joined as plaintiff with the original plaintiff. “ In case of a transfer .... of interest, the action or proceeding may be continued in the name of the original party, or the court may allow the person to whom the transfer is made to be substituted in the action or proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 385.) It would be too narrow a construction of this section to hold that it applies only where the transfer is of the entire interest.

By section 369 of the Code of Civil Procedure it is provided : —

“ A trustee of an express trust may sue without joining with him the person for whose benefit the action is prosecuted."

Williams was not a trustee of an express trust, but if he were, the code only permits the non-joinder.