Tilden v. Saucelito Land & Ferry Co.
California Supreme Court Oct 26, 1882 No. No. 7,222Published
Synopsis
Conflict in Testimony—Finding—Verdict.—There is a substantial conflict in the evidence on the question of the employment of the plaintiff, by the defendant, and therefore the verdict cannot be disturbed.
The Court: The sole point discussed on the argument in this case, relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.
It is contended that there is no evidence that the plaintiff was ever engaged by the defendant to do the work to recover pay for which the action was brought.
In our judgment the case is one of substantial conflict of evidence on this point, and according to the long settled rule, the verdict cannot be disturbed.
Judgment and order affirmed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)