Barilari v. Ferrea

Appeals from judgments for the plaintiff and. from orders •denying new trials, in the Third District Court, County of Alameda. McKee, J.

The complaints in these two cases were filed on the same day—No. 6962 being to foreclose a lien under a contract executed August 23d, 1876, and No. 6963 to foreclose a lien under a contract executed September 12th, 1876. The two cases were heard together, and their records are similar. The statement is therefore made of one case only (No. 6962). The complaint alleges that the defendants entered into a contract in writing with the plaintiff for the contract price of one thousand eight hundred and fifty dollars, and sets out specifically the terms of the contract; that the contract was completed on the 11th day of November, 1876; that the plaintiff, at the special instance and request of the defendants, did certain extra work for the sum of one hundred and seventy-three dollars and forty-three cents, which the defendant agreed to pay; that the sum of one thousand two hundred and fifty dollars was paid, and no more, and that there remained due a balance of seven hundred and seventy-three dollars and forty-three cents. The allegation as to lien was as follows:

That on the 22d day of December, 1876, he, the said plaintiff, duly filed for record with the County Recorder of the said County of Alameda, that being the county in which said premises are situated, a claim of lien containing a statement of his demand after deducting all just credits and offsets, with the names of the said owners, the said defendants, with a statement of the terms, time given, and conditions of his, plaintiff’s, contract, with said defendants, and, also, a description of the said premises, the said property to be charged with said lien claimed by plaintiff; that said description was sufficient for identification of said premises, said property; and that said statement and claim were duly verified by the oath of plaintiff; that said claim of lien and statement was duly recorded by the said County Recorder in Liber “ C” of Mechanics’ Lien, on page 281, to which lien and record particular reference is herein made; and the same is herein referred to and made a part hereof.

The finding was as follows:

4. That subsequently, to wit, on the 22d day of December, 1876, said plaintiff duly filed with the County Recorder of the said County of Alameda, being the county in which said lands and premises and said houses are situated, his claim duly verified by the oath of said plaintiff, containing a statement of his said demand after deducting all just credits and offsets, with the names of the said defendants, as the owners thereof and as the persons by whom he was employed, with a statement of the terms of the said contract, the time given and the conditions thereof, and also the description of the property described in the complaint, and being the property sought to be charged with the lien; the said claim being for the sum of seven hundred and seventy-three dollars and forty-three cents, claimed to be due plaintiff by defendants, upon said contract and for said extra work, to wit, six hundred dollars. Balance on said contract one hundred and seventy-four dollars and forty-three cents for said work done. And the said notice of lien and claim of plaintiff against said defendants and said premises was, on said 22d day of December, 1876, made and executed by plaintiff in the manner provided by law, and then and there duly filed and recorded by the County Recorder of said County of Alameda. That the expenses incurred by plaintiff in and about the making and filing said notice of lien, amounted to the sum of ten dollars.