Ward v. Superior Court
Before: Ross
Synopsis
Undertaking ox Appeal—Justice’s Court.—On appeal from a judgment in a Justice’s Court, one of the conditions of the undertaking was, that the appellant would pay all costs recovered against him in the appellate court.
Meld, That neither the circumstance that the amount of the bond was more than one hundred dollars, nor the circumstance that it was insufficient in amount to operate a stay of execution, rendered the appeal ineffectual.
Ross, J.: One of the conditions of the undertaking on appeal was, that the appellant would pay all costs recovered against him in the appellate court. Neither the circumstance that the amount of the bond was more than one hundred dollars, nor the other circumstance, that it was insufficient in amount to operate a stay of execution, rendered the appeal ineffectual.
Writ denied and proceedings dismissed.
McKinstry, J., and McKee, J., concurred.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)