Freeman v. Rahm
Before: Myrick, Thornton
Synopsis
A Contract for Sale of Real Estate —Statute of Frauds—Attachment—Injunction.—J. R. C. sold to the plaintiff all his interest in the estate of W. J. C., deceased, received the full amount of the purchase money therefor, and executed and delivered to him a full and irrevocable power of attorney to receive his distributive share of the estate; which was duly recorded, but no deed executed; and a decree of distribution was subsequently made by the Probate Court, by which an undivided one eighteenth of certain land of the estate was distributed to J. R. C. Afterwards (March 31st, 1880), an attachment, at the suit of one P., was levied on the interest of J. R. C. in the premises. April 6th, 1880, J. R. C. executed to the plaintiff a deed of all his interest in the land, and the deed was recorded April 24th, 1880. April 12th, 1880, judgment was rendered in the attachment suit against J. R. C., and execution issued, and this suit was brought to enjoin the sale.
Held: The plaintiff, if he had any rights, was estopped by the decree of distribution from asserting title to the premises.
The power of attorney did not purport to be and was not a transfer of the title; and there was no instrument in writing by which any sale or contract of sale or declaration of trust was evidenced.
Opinion — Myrick
Myrick, J.: This action was brought to restrain the defendant as sheriff from proceeding to sell certain real estate on an execution against J. R. Campbell. One W. J. Campbell died seised of real estate, to an undivided "eighteenth of which said J. R. Campbell became entitled by succession. On the 11th of December, 1877, while the estate of W. J. Campbell was in process of administration, said J. R. Campbell sold to plaintiff all his interest in the estate of said W. J. Campbell, deceased, received the full amount of the purchase money therefor, and executed and delivered to plaintiff a full and irrevocable power of attorney to receive his distributive share of the estate, which power was acknowledged and recorded before October 13tli, 1879; no deed, however, was then executed. On the 13th of October, 1879, after due proceedings and notice, a decree of distribution of the estate was made by the Probate Court, by which decree an undivided one eighteenth of said estate was distributed to said J. R. Campbell. No mention of plaintiff, or the purchase by him, or of the power of attorney was made in the decree; but the Court in the decree recited that J. R. Campbell was entitled to an undivided one eighteenth, and distributed the same to him in the usual form. On or about the 31st day of March, 1880, one Perry commenced an action in the Superior Court against said J. R. Campbell, and on that day caused the interest of said J. R. Campbell in said premises to be attached. On the 6th day of April, 1880, said J. R. Campbell executed to plaintiff a deed [114]of all his interest in certain described premises, which deed contained the statement that “the interest hereby conveyed is the undivided one eighteenth of all the real estate above described, as per decree of the Probate Court of said Yolo County, made and entered in the settlement of the estate of W. J. Campbell, deceased, on the 13th day of October, 1879.” This deed was recorded April 24th, 1880. On the 12th day of April, 1880, in the said action, said Perry recovered a judgment against said J. R Campbell for four hundred and thirty-five dollars and sixty-five cents and costs, and on or about the same day caused an execution to be issued on said judgment and placed in the hands of the defendant, Sheriff of Yolo County. Under such execution the defendant was proceeding to sell, and this action was brought to restrain the sale. Neither plaintiff nor J. R. Campbell was ever in the actual possession of the premises. The Court below in this action rendered judgment for defendant.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)