Pulliam v. Bennett
Before: Bank, McKee
Synopsis
Ejectment—Construction of Deed.—G. being the owner of the Bosquejo or Lassen Rancho, agreed to convey to E. and XV. 5,000 acres of land from the lower end of the rancho—500 acres to F. and 4,000 to XV.—and in pursuance of the agreement, on the same day executed deeds to F. and XV.; but, as to which was delivered first, the evidence was conflicting. The land conveyed to XV. was described as “being 4,500 acres of land, taken off of the lower or most southerly portion of the rancho, * * * extending the full width of said rancho, from the westerly to the easterly boundaries thereof, and as far above the southerly line as shall be necessary to include ® * * 4,500 acres of land, provided that no part of the land hereby conveyed . » * * shall be or extend north of a straight line drawn from a point on the Sacramento, at a distance of one Spanish league south of the moutli of Deer Creek, due east to the easterly boundary line of said rancho; and if there should not be 4,500 acres of land between the said line and the southerly line of said rancho, the balance or residue of said land, to make up the said 4,500 acres, shall be taken off from the south-easterly corner of said rancho, in a square form.” The land conveyed to F. was described as “ being 500 acres of the rancho; * ® * it being expressly understood that the said 500 acres shall he taken off of the south-westerly corner of said rancho, in a rectangular form, the frontage along the Sacramento River to be not moro than one-half the depth; provided that no part of the land conveyed shall be or extend north of a straight lino,” etc.—(being the same as described in the first deed). In an action of ejectment brought by grantees of F. against subsequent grantees of G., held, that the deeds, being executed at the same time, were to be regarded as parts of one and the same transaction; and that, reading the deeds together, it must have been understood and agreed that the XV. deed should be first located; and that the 500 acres conveyed to F. were to be located on the south-westerly corner of the rancho, after the location of the XVilson tract.
Id.—Statute of Limitations — Adveese Possession. —Held, further, upon the evidence, that the possession of the land by G., after his conveyance to F., xvas not adverse.
McKee, J.: The action is ejectment. The land in dispute was originally part of the Bosquejo or Lassen Rancho, lying partly in the County of Tehama and partly in the County of Butte. Plaintiffs claim title to it by mesne conveyances from one Henry Gerke, who was the owner of it. The rancho was patented in 1862. But in 1856 there was pending between Gerke and one Henry Ford and II. L. Wilson a controversy for one-third of the rancho. This controversy was compromised and settled by Gerke agreeing to convey to Wilson and Ford 5,000 acres from the lower end of the rancho—4,500 acres to Wilson, and 500 acres to Ford. In performance of his agreement, Gerke had two deeds prepared, one to Wilson for 4,500 acres, and another to Ford for 500 acres. In the Wilson deed the land is described as follows: “All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the County of Tehama, said [370]State, described as follows, to wit: being four thousand five hundred (4,500) acres of land taken off of the lower or most southerly portion of the rancho known as the Bosquejo or Lassen Rancho, extending the full width of said rancho, from the westerly to the easterly boundaries thereof, and as far above the southerly line of said rancho as shall be necessary to include or contain four thousand five hundred acres of land; provided, that no part of the land hereby conveyed, or intended to be conveyed, shall be or extend north of a straight line drawn from a point on the Sacramento River, at a distance of one Spanish league south of the mouth of Deer Creek, due east to the easterly boundary line of said rancho; and if there should not be four thousand five hundred acres of land between said line and the southerly line of said rancho, then the balance or residue of land, to make up the said four thousand five hundred acres, shall be taken off from the south-easterly corner of said rancho, in a square form; the westerly boundary of said last named square not to extend within one Spanish league of the Sacramento River.”
The piremises conveyed by the Ford deed are described as follows: “ All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the County of Tehama, said State, described as follows, to wit: being 500 acres of the rancho known as the Bosquejo or Lassen Rancho. It being expressly understood that the said 500 acres shall be taken off of the south-westerly corner of said rancho in a rectangular form, the frontage along the Sacramento River to be not more than one-half the depth. Provided, that no part of the land hereby conveyed, or intended to be conveyed, shall be or extend north of a straight line drawn from a point on the Sacramento River one Spanish league south of the mouth of Deer Creek, due east to the easterly boundary line of said rancho.”
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)