Tillson v. Ford
Synopsis
Municipal Elections in San Ebancisco. — The Act of April 2nd, 1866, (Acts 1865-6, p. 719) relative to elections and officers in San Francisco, applies only to officials holding office at the time of its passage, and was not intended to supply the rule applicable to the filling of vacancies, should any occur, after the expiration of the terms of such incumbents.
Same—Political Code. — The first chapter of title 2, part 4, of the Political Code, which treats of “the Board of Supervisors,” does not apply to the City and County of San Francisco.
Same—Consolidation Act.—The municipal elections and the terms of municipal officers in San Francisqo are provided for in the Consolidation Act.
Pkesumed Knowledge op Votebs.—While all voters are presumed to know the law and the time when the full terms of office expire, they are not presumed to know the fact that an officer has resigned or died.
Municipal Oppices m San Fbancisco — Vacancies. — Where a vacancy occurs in a municipal office in San Francisco by the death of the incumbent, a person elected by the Board of Supervisors to fill the vacancy is entitled to the office only until his successor is elected by the people.
Election Peoclamation—Vacancies.—If the election proclamation inform the voters at a general election that a vacancy has occurred in an office, and if it notify them to meet in their respective districts on the day of the election for the purpose of electing an officer for the nnexpired term, it will he sufficient, though it fail to designate the election as a special election.
By the Court : The eighth section of the Act of April 2nd, 1866, (Acts 1865-6, p. 719) has no bearing upon the present controversy. That Act is entitled “ An Act to change the time for holding municipal elections in the City and County of San Francisco, and to define the official terms of certain officers therein mentioned,” and, after providing for the objects specified in its title, declares, in sec. 8, with reference to the persons holding [705]office at the time of its passage, as follows : “ All of the present city and county officers as designated in secs. 4, 5, and 7 of this act, and the State Harbor Commissioners as designated in sec. 8, (?) shall continue in office during the entire term for which they were elected, and until their successors are elected and qualified as provided for in this act: provided, that any officer elected or appointed to fill a vacancy which may in any manner occur shall serve only during the unexpired term of his predecessor, and until his successor is elected and qualified.”
It is sufficiently clear that the eighth section refers to the then present incumbents, and was not intended to supply the rule applicable to the filling of vacancies, should any occur after the expiration of the terms of such incumbents.
Nor are the sections of the Political Code referred to by counsel for appellant decisive of the questions before us. The first chapter of title 2 of part 4 of the Political Code, which treats of “ The Board of Supervisors,” does not apply to the City and County of San Francisco, (Political Code, sec. 4087) and by the nineteenth preliminary provision of the same Code it is declared that nothing therein contained shall affect any of the acts incorporating or chartering municipal corporations, or consolidating cities and counties, or amending or supplementing such acts.
The rights of the parties before us are, therefore, to be determined by reference to the ninth section of “An Act to repeal the several charters of the City of San Francisco, to establish the boundaries of the City and County of San Francisco, and to consolidate the government thereof,” usually cited as the Consolidation Act. The first clause of that section is as follows: “ Whenever vacancies occur in any elective office of the said city and county, and provision is not otherwise made in this or some other act for filling the same until the next election, the Board of Supervisors shall appoint a person to discharge the duties of such office until the next election, when the vacancy shall be filled by election for the term.”
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)