Harlan v. Pratt
California Supreme Court Jul 1, 1875 No. No. 4705Published
Synopsis
Dismissal of Appeal.—If the record shows that no appeal has been taken by reason of failure to serve the notice of appeal in time, a motion to dismiss the appeal will be denied.
By the Court: The notice of appeal was filed on March 21,1874, but was not served until the 23d of that month. Under the statute, [95]as it stood at those periods, these steps did not operate an appeal. (Columbet v. Pacheco, 46 Cal. 650.) Upon the face of the record, no appeal appearing to have been taken, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be denied.
So ordered.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)