Templeton v. Coburn
California Supreme Court Jul 1, 1874 No. No. 4,334Published
Synopsis
Feanohise to Coksteuct a Whaef.—An application to the Board of Supervisors for a franchise to construct a wharf in accordance with the provisions of the Act of March 1, 1870, must particularly describe the locality of the wharf.
The Court reversed the judgment and directed that the action be dismissed on the ground that the application did not describe the location of the wharf and chute, with the degree of particularity required by section two, of the Act of March 1, 1870. (Stats. 1869-70, p. 526.)
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)