People v. Ladd
California Supreme Court Jul 1, 1874 No. No. 4,083Published
Synopsis
Resolution to Impeove a Stbeet.—If a resolution of intention to improve a street in San Francisco provides that the street shall be improved where necessary, the Board of Supervisors acquires no jurisdiction, and the assessment is void.
By the Court: The resolution of intention, upon which the assessment is founded, was, among other things, that Folsom Street, from First to Second, be repaired “ where necessary,” and that “ curbs and sidewalks thereon be reconstructed where necessary,” etc. Upon the authority of Richardson v. Heydenfeldt, 46 Cal. 68, and People v. Clark, ante, 456, the judgment and order denying a new trial are affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)