Himmelmann v. Haskell
California Supreme Court Jul 1, 1873 No. No. 3,653Published
Synopsis
Construction of Bulb.—A party moving under Buie Fifteen, to place a cause on the calendar for failure to comply with Buie Two as to tiling briefs, must show the opposite party was in default at the time the calendar was to he made up.
By the Court: A party moving under Rule Fifteen that a cause be placed on the calendar, on the ground that “ the opposite party has failed to file his transcript or his brief, or points and authorities, as prescribed by Rule Two,” must show that the opposite party was in default at the time when the Clerk was required by Rule Fifteen to make up the calendar.
Motion denied.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)