Ellis v. Polhemus
Before: Rhodes, Sakdersos, Sawyer, Shafter
Synopsis
Rate of Interest on Claims against Insolvent Estates.—If the estate of the deceased is insolvent, the administrator cannot pay more than ten per cent interest per annum, from and after the time of issuing letters, on any claim against the estate contracted after May 20th, 1861, even if the rate of interest specified in the contract is more than ten per cent per annum, and the claim is secured by a mortgage. Claim against an Estate.—Per Sanderson, G. J.—The word “claim” as used in the Act concerning the estates of deceased persons, when it speaks of claims against an estate, is broad enough to include a mortgage.
Cases Commented on.—The cases of Fallon v. Butler, 21 Cal. 24, and Filiasen v.
JBalleck, 6 Cal. 386, and Faulkner v. Folsom’s Executors, 6 Cal. 412, commented on. Per Rhodes, J.—A note secured by mortgage is a claim against the estate, but the mortgage given to secure the note is not such claim.
Per Shafter, J., Sawyer, J., concurring.—The word “ claim,” as used in the one hundred and thirty-first section of the Act concerning the estates of deceased persons, includes mortgages as well as claims at large against the estate.
Opinion — Sakdersos
By the Court, Sakdersos, C. J. On the first day of April, 1862, Horace P. Janes gave to Moses Ellis his promissory note for twenty-five thousand dollars, payable one year from date, with interest at the rate of one and one quarter per cent per month, payable monthly; and to secure its payment gave a mortgage on certain real estate in the City of San Francisco. Janes died before the note matured. It was duly presented to the administrator of the estate of Janes, was allowed by him, and approved by the Probate Judge, and thereupon filed in the Probate Court, on the 12th. of August, 1863, as a valid claim against the estate.
The administrator paid the interest on the claim, at the rate of one and one quarter per cent per month, to December 28,
1863. Subsequent to the last payment of interest, the administrator sold the mortgaged premises, and the proceeds of the sale were more than sufficient to pay the debt and interest at the rate specified in the note. Whereupon Moses Ellis filed his petition in the Probate Court, and sought to compel the administrator to account for his proceedings in the matter of the sale, and to pay to the, petitioner twenty-five thousand dollars, with interest at the rate of one and one quarter per cent per month from the 28th day of December, 1863.
The foregoing facts were admitted by the administrator; but it further appeared that the estate of the deceased was insolvent; and that the fact of such insolvency was not discovered by the administrator until the 6th day of January, 1864. The Court ordered the administrator to pay the peti[354]tioner twenty-five thousand dollars, with interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum only, from the date of the letters of administration, to wit: November 9, 1862, less all sums of money which had been paid as interest since that day. The petitioner appealed, and now claims that the Court below erred in holding that he was entitled to ten per cent per annum only instead of one and one quarter per cent per month according to the terms of the note.
The one hundred and thirty-first section of the Probate Act provides, among other things, that “In case the estate is insolvent, no claim contracted after the passage of this Act shall bear greater interest than ten per cent per annum from and after the time of issuing letters.” The foregoing became a part of the law of the land on the 20th of May, 1861—nearly a year before the note and mortgage in question were made.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)