McIntyre v. Willis
Before: Cope, Field
Synopsis
Wheke an appeal is taken from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial, and the statement on appeal from the judgment is not prepared within the statutory time, and the statement on appeal from the order refusing a new trial is not agreed to by the parties or their counsel, or settled by the Judge who tried the cause, nothing but the judgment roll will be considered by the appellate Court.
Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court—Cope, J. concurring. The statement on appeal from the judgment was not prepared within the statutory time. It cannot, therefore, be looked into for the determination of the errors assigned by the appellants. The statement on appeal from the order refusing a new trial is not agreed to by the parties or them counsel, or settled by the Judge who tried the cause. It constitutes, therefore, no part of the record which we can notice. This disposition of the two statements leaves the case to rest upon the judgment roll, and that discloses no error.
Judgment affirmed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)