Moore v. Roff
California Supreme Court Jul 1, 1859Published
The facts of this case are similar to the facts in Moore et al. v. Wilkinson et al. with the exception that the defendants have never filed any declaratory statement of their intention to preempt the quarter sections which they occupy. The case, if possible, is more barren of merit than the one cited, and on that authority the judgment is affirmed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)