Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus Water Co.
Before: Burnett
Synopsis
A complaint which alleges that the plaintiffs were, on a certain day, the owners and proprietors of a certain valuable water-ditch for the purpose of conveying water, and at which time and place the defendants were also the owners of a certain other water-ditch for the purpose aforesaid, and that afterwards, on the same day ánd year, at etc., aforesaid, the said defendants’ ditch was so badly and negligently constructed and managed, and the water therein so negligently and carelessly attended to, that said ditch broke and gave way, and the water therein flowed over and upon the ditch of plaintiffs, greatly damaging and injuring the same, and carrying down therein and thereon great quantities of rock, stone, earth, and rubbish, and breaking said plaintiffs’ ditch, and depriving them of the use and profit of the water flowing therein, to said plaintiffs’ damage of $3000, and thereof they bring suit, is sufficient.
A person who has been a stockholder in an incorporated company, but ceased to be such holder before suit was brought, is a competent witness in an action in the name of such company.
Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court Terry, C. J., concurring.
1. The complaint in this case is sufficient.
2. The witness Morrissey had no interest in the event of the suit, having ceased to be a stockholder before the suit was brought.
3. The damages were not excessive.
Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)