Minor v. City of San Francisco (1858) · DecisionDepot

Minor v. City of San Francisco

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

California Supreme Court Jul 1, 1858Published

Before: Burnett, Terry

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that the issues in this case are identical to those decided in Woods v. The City and affirmed the judgment based on the reasoning provided in that prior decision.

Issues

Whether the legal questions in this case differ from those decided in Woods v. The City (4 Cal., 190).

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The questions raised in this case are, in all essential particulars, the same as those decided in the case of Woods v. The City, (4 Cal., 190.)”

“The reasons given, and the views expressed in the opinion .of the Court in that case are entirely applicable to the facts of this ease.”

“The judgment is therefore affirmed.”

Synopsis

$or the points decided in this case, see the case of Joseph Woods v. The City of San ¡Francisco, 4 Cal. ¡R., 190.

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J.,. concurring. The questions raised in this case are, in all essential particulars, the same as those decided in the case of Woods v. The City, (4 Cal., 190.) The learned counsel for plaintiff has sought to show a difference in the two cases; but has failed, in our judgment, to make it out. The reasons given, and the views expressed in the opinion .of the Court in that case are entirely applicable to the facts of this ease.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Minor v. City of San Francisco

AI Brief

Synopsis

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief