Kyburg v. Perkins
Before: Terry
Synopsis
The book of accounts kept in the office of an alcalde is admissible in evidence, as a register of the acts of that officer, belonging to the office.
To entitle a book to the character of an official register, it is not necessary that it be required by an express statute to be kept, nor that the nature of the office should render the book indispensable. It is sufficient that it is directed by the proper officer to be kept.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Terry. Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.
There was no error in admitting in evidence the book of accounts kept in the office of the alcalde. It was a register of acts done by the officer, kept by his direction, and was handed over by each alcalde to his successor as belonging to the office.
[676]To entitle a book to the character of an official register, it is not necessary that it be required by an express statute to be kept, nor that the nature of the office should render the book indispensable; it is sufficient that it be directed by the proper authority to be kept. 1 Green. Ev., § 496.
Judgment affirmed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)