Buckelew v. Chipman
Before: Heydenfeldt
Synopsis
In a suit in equity for relief against a judgment at law, the complainant will not be entitled to relief, unless the evidence alleged in the bill to be newly discovered, appears to be incontrovertible and conclusive.
Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Murray, C. J., and Bryan, J., concurred.
This is a bill in equity for relief against a judgment at law, and a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence.
The rule in such cases is, that to entitle the complainant to relief, the newly discovered evidence must appear to be incontrovertible and conclusive.
In this case it consists of the testimony of one witness, whereas the bill states that the judgment at law was obtained upon the testimony of two witnesses, and the issue was upon a single fact. The just inference is, that upon a new trial the result of the issue would be the same.
Judgment affirmed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)