Russell v. Alvarez
Before: Murray
Synopsis
In an action for freight money brought in the Courts of this State, it is not a sufficient answer to set up that the vessel has been libelled, for the non-delivery of freight, in the District Court of the United States; both actions may proceed at the same time without the fear or danger of any collision or clashing of jurisdiction.
Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.
In an action for freight money brought in the Courts of this State, it is not a. sufficient answer to set up that the vessel has been libelled, [49]for the non-delivery of freight, in the District Court of the United States; both actions may proceed at the same time Without the fear or danger of any collision or clashing of jurisdiction.
Judgment affirmed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)