Taylor v. McKinley
Before: Heydeneeldt, Murray
Synopsis
Appeal from the Superior Court of San Francisco.
The plaintiff sued for work done on the sloop Nabob & Ruth, and a wharf and lime-kiln, ajl belonging to the defendants.
The defendants McKinley and Garrioch answered, denying each of the allegations of the complaint.
The jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, whereupon the defendant McKinley applied to the Court for a new trial, and, in support of his application, filed his own affidavit, alleging that he had been surprised at the trial, by the production of his co-defendant, Mowbray, as a witness on behalf of plaintiff. After hearing the counter affidavit of B. F. Byan, attorney for plaintiff, the Court refused to grant a new trial, and the defendants McKinley and Garrioch appealed.
The affidavit of surprise is not a ground for a neW trial, after verdict. It is no ground for a new trial that a party is not prepared. (5 Dana, 34; 8 Johns. 842; 15 Johns. 210; 4 Caines, 118.) Or that, upon a new trial, he could contradict a witness. (3 Greenleaf, 77.)
Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.
Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred. This Court has always refused to interfere with the verdict of a jury, where the evidence is dubious or conflicting. Nor, in such case, will we revise the discretion of the Court below, in granting or refusing a new trial.
The assignments of error made in this case are too unsubstantial to require consideration or argument.
Let the judgment be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)