In re \California College\""

[330] By the Court,

Bennett, J. This application is made under an act of the legislature of which the first three sections are as follows ; “ Section 1. Any college may be incorporated in this “ state according to the provisions of this act by the supreme “court of the state upon application. Section 2. The founders “ or contributors of any proposed college within this state shall “ make to the supreme court an application in writing under “ their hands, requesting that •—--College may be incorpo- “ rated, specifying the first trustees and the name by which the “ corporation is to be called. Section 3. In case the court “ shall be satisfied that the proposed college has an endowment “ of twenty thousand dollars, and that the proposed trustees are “ capable men, then the court shall, by an instrument under its “ seal, declare the College incorporated under the provisions of “ this act, by the name specified in the application, and the application together with the declaration of the court shall be “ recorded in the office of tire secretary of state.”

The application in this case must be refused. To say nothing' of the serious doubts entertained, whether the endowment mentioned in the third section, should not be a cash endowment, we are not satisfied that the proposed college has ail endowment in cash, in real estate, or otherwise, to the amount required by the statute. A very small proportion of the subscription is of cash. By far the greater part is of real estate ; and we have no evidence that the subscribers have any title to the lots they have subscribed. The most serious objection, however, to the application is, that the persons who have come forward so liberally to forward the cause of education in this state, have neglected to designate in their subscriptions the particular description of the lands which they are willing to bestow upon the contemplated institution. Tims, there are some subscriptions of village lots in San José and Alviso, without any designation of the numbers of the lots, of their natural boundaries, of their natural monuments, or other marks, by which it may be determined where they are situated, and whether the land is worth five dollars or five hundred dollars. It is true that there are affidavits that the lands subscribed are worth more than the amount re[331]