In re Jordan M. CA2/5

Filed 10/18/21 In re Jordan M. CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re JORDAN M., a Person B310173 Coming Under the Juvenile (Los Angeles County Court Law. Super. Ct. No. 20LJJP00008C)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

E.B.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robin R. Kesler, Judge Pro Tempore. Affirmed. Anne E. Fragasso, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Rodrigo A. Castro-Silva, County Counsel, Kim Nemoy, Assistant County Counsel, Kimberly Roura, Senior Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. ________________________________

E.B. (mother) challenges the juvenile dependency court’s legal authority to enter a disposition order imposing a case plan on mother after declaring her infant child Jordan M. (minor) a dependent under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300.1 Respondent Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) contends the case plan was within the court’s authority. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Consistent with our standard of review, we state the facts in the light most favorable to the juvenile court’s findings, resolving all conflicts and drawing all reasonable inferences to uphold the court’s order, if possible. (In re R.T. (2017) 3 Cal.5th 622, 633.)