People v. Renteria CA2/4

Filed 9/24/21 P. v. Renteria CA2/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE, B309905 c/w B310534

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA038347) v.

RONALD DAVE RENTERIA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William C. Ryan, Judge. Dismissed. Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

“In 1998, a jury convicted appellant [Ronald Dave Renteria] of carjacking ([Pen. Code,] § 215, subd. (a)) and escape from custody without use of force or violence ([Pen. Code,] § 4532, subd. (b)).[1] In connection with the carjacking conviction, the jury found true a special allegation that appellant used a gun in the commission of the offense (former § 12022.5, subd. (a)(2)). After finding that appellant had suffered two strikes under the ‘Three Strikes’ law (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)) in 1989, the trial court imposed an aggregate term of 69 years to life, which included a 27-year term for the carjacking conviction under the Three Strikes law, a 10-year term for the associated gun use enhancement, and a term of 25 years to life for the escape from custody conviction under the Three Strikes law.” (People v. Renteria (Sep. 12, 2017, B280477) 2017 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 6206, at [1]-[2]