In re C.N. CA2/1
Filed 7/26/21 In re C.N. CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
In re C.N., et al., B307169
Persons Coming Under the (Los Angeles County Juvenile Court Law. Super. Ct. No. 20CCJP02175)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
K.N.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael E. Whitaker, Judge. Dismissed. Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates and Vincent W. Davis for Defendant and Appellant.
Rodrigo A. Castro-Silva, County Counsel, Kim Nemoy, Assistant County Counsel, and Stephanie Jo Reagan, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________
Father K.N. appeals from the juvenile court’s August 3, 2020, dispositional order removing his three children from him and Mother, C.V.1 Mother is not participating in the appeal. While the appeal was pending, the juvenile court terminated the order placing the children in foster care and ordered the children returned to the parents.2 Accordingly, we dismiss Father’s appeal as moot.3 BACKGROUND Father and Mother had three children together. At the time of the combined jurisdictional and dispositional hearing, C.N., a daughter, was 12 years old; B.N., a son, was 10 years old; and A.N., a son, was seven years old. In February and March 2020, the Department of Children and Family Services
1 The notice of appeal indicates that Father challenges “[a]ll findings and orders made by the court” at the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing on August 3, 2020. On appeal, however, Father does not argue the juvenile court erred in making its jurisdictional findings. 2 On our own motion, we take judicial notice of the juvenile court’s three June 22, 2021, minute orders. (See Evid. Code, §§ 452, subd. (d), 459, subd. (a).) 3 We also deny as moot the motion to dismiss this appeal filed by the Department of Children and Family Services on March 1, 2021.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)