In re A.G. CA1/2

California Court of Appeal Jun 16, 2021 No. A161043MUnpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court dismissed the father's appeal of a visitation order as moot because the juvenile court had subsequently terminated its dependency jurisdiction, leaving the appellate court with no effective relief to grant.

Issues

Whether an appeal of a juvenile court's visitation order is rendered moot by the subsequent termination of dependency jurisdiction.

Disposition. dismissed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“We dismiss the appeal as moot.”

“[T]he critical factor in considering whether a dependency appeal is moot is whether the appellate court can provide any effective relief if it finds reversible error.”

Filed 6/15/21 In re A.G. CA1/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re A.G., et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

HUMBOLDT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, A161043

v. (Humboldt County Alan G., Super. Ct. Nos. JV190021/ JV2000017) Defendant and Appellant.

BY THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 15, 2021, be modified as follows: In the caption on page 1, the second superior court number listed should be modified to add an additional “0”. The number should read JV2000017. This modification does not change the judgment.

Dated: ____________________ ______________________________ Kline, P.J.

Filed 6/15/21 In re A.G. CA1/2 (unmodified opinion) NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

In re A.G. CA1/2

AI Brief

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief