People v. Mendez CA5
Filed 6/15/21 P. v. Mendez CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
THE PEOPLE, F079853 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F17901716) v.
MARCO ANTONIO MENDEZ, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.
THE COURT* APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Heather Mardel Jones, Judge. Erica Gambale, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Eric L. Christoffersen and Catherine Chatman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-
* Before Poochigian, Acting P.J., Peña, J. and Meehan, J.
INTRODUCTION On March 11, 2017, officers with the Fresno Police Department searched defendant Marco Antonio Mendez’s vehicle and arrested him after locating a loaded firearm and a box of ammunition.1 Defendant was subsequently charged by information filed August 27, 2018, with possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1); count 1),2 carrying a loaded firearm in public (§ 25850, subd. (a); count 2), carrying a concealed firearm in a vehicle (§ 25400, subd. (a)(1); count 3), and possession of ammunition by a felon (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1); count 4). The information also alleged two prior prison term enhancements pursuant to section 667.5, former subdivision (b). On July 22, 2019, defendant pleaded no contest to count 1 and admitted one prior prison term allegation in exchange for dismissal of the remaining counts and the second prior prison term allegation, and a stipulated prison term of three years. On August 19, 2019, the trial court sentenced defendant to the middle term of two years on count 1 plus an additional one year for the prior prison term enhancement, in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain. The court also imposed a restitution fine of $300 under section 1202.4, subdivision (b)(1); a parole revocation restitution fine of $300 under section 1202.45, subdivision (a), suspended; a court operations assessment of $40 under section 1465.8; and a court facilities assessment of $30 under Government Code section 70373. Defendant advances one claim on appeal. He requests that we vacate the one-year prior prison term enhancement under Senate Bill No. 136 (2019–2020 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill No. 136), which became effective January 1, 2020.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)