In re A.N. CA1/5

Filed 5/21/21 In re A.N. CA1/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re A.N., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A160907 A.N., (San Mateo County Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. Nos. 20-JW-0006, 20-JW-0356)

A.N. (Minor) appeals the juvenile court’s imposition of electronics search probation conditions. We affirm. BACKGROUND After a juvenile wardship petition was filed alleging Minor committed multiple offenses, Minor admitted one count of robbery (Pen. Code, § 212.5, subd. (c)).1 The disposition hearing was held on July 30, 2020. A probation report filed in advance of the hearing recommended Minor be committed to the

1 The underlying facts are not relevant to this appeal.

1

G.I.R.L.S. Program at the Margaret J. Kemp Camp for Girls (GIRLS Program). The recommended probation conditions included broad electronics search conditions.2 At the disposition hearing, Minor’s counsel objected to the electronics search conditions. In response, the probation officer explained the conditions “are a standing order of the GIRLS Program” that are intended to apply even when minors are outside the facility on home passes or community passes. The probation officer further explained, “The standard procedure for us is once they are released from camp to phase two, they are on EMP [Electronic Monitoring Program], which EMP has also had a standing order for no cell phones and then once they complete that portion when we go back to court for the girls’ review, at that time we normally will ask the court for permission for them to have a cell phone . . . .” The juvenile court initially modified the conditions to clarify that they applied only while Minor was in the GIRLS Program. Then, after a recess, the court vacated this modification as unnecessary: “the court is making orders for the minor to be in the GIRLS Program and at the Girls Camp. [¶]