People v. Murray CA1/1
Filed 4/29/21 P. v. Murray CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160644
v. (San Francisco City & County DUSTIN MURRAY, Super. Ct. No. 19008435, SCN231445) Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant was charged in an information with first degree burglary and misdemeanor receiving stolen property. A jury convicted him of receiving stolen property. We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 30, 2019, Victor L. and his girlfriend, J.L. were asleep in their apartment, when Victor heard a “clicking noise, just a little shuffle.” He “kind of closed [his] eyes” but woke up “to a noise at the foot of the bed.” He initially thought the person standing at the foot of the bed was his girlfriend. However, when Victor “reached over,” and realized J.L. was still in bed, he jumped out of the bed. There was a man standing at the door looking at him repeating, “it’s okay bro.” The bedroom is actually a big closet that fits a queen-size bed. Victor “navigate[d] the door to get out.” Though Victor “lunged out,” he was unable to grab the man, only making “contact” with him as the man “slid out the door.” Victor pursued the intruder down the hallway
and four flights of stairs to the front door of the building where he discontinued the pursuit. Victor returned upstairs to find J.L. standing at the door with a phone in her hand. He instructed her to call 911. As they were talking to 911, Victor heard the same voice as he heard at the end of the bed coming from Larch Street (referred to during trial testimony as “Larch Alley” or the “Larch alleyway”), which runs parallel to the long edge of their building. After calling 911, Victor L. and J.L. discovered their kitchen window leading to the fire escape was open; it was closed when they went to bed. J.L.’s laptop and charging cord were missing. The Eye Institute building is located next to the victims’ apartment building. A May 30, 2019 DVD from the Eye Institute’s surveillance system, taken before the burglary, depicted an individual searching through a dumpster located in the Larch Alley. The figure then climbed over the fence separating the Eye Institute property from the apartment building and climbed onto the fire escape to the next landing before disappearing from the camera’s view. San Francisco Police Officer Michael Petuya responded to Larch Street and Van Ness Avenue regarding an individual who had broken into an apartment through a fire escape window and had taken “a bag and a laptop from the owners.” Because he was told the individual had fled the building to the Larch alleyway, he proceeded to the alley to look for the possible suspect. As soon as he arrived “on scene,” and exited his patrol vehicle, he observed defendant leaving the area of 725 Van Ness Avenue onto Larch. Defendant walked across the street in front of a smaller sedan and threw what appeared to be a black bag underneath the sedan. Petuya immediately detained defendant. Petuya then went to the car under which defendant had thrown
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)