People v. Outlaw CA1/1
Filed 3/11/21 P. v. Outlaw CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160842
v. (Mendocino County Super. Ct. JASON MARCUS OUTLAW, No. SCUK-CRCR-19-32613) Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Jason Marcus Outlaw appeals from the trial court’s imposition of a six-year prison term after Outlaw pleaded no contest to felony domestic violence and multiple misdemeanor counts of resisting arrest. Outlaw’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), identifying no issues and requesting that this court review the record and determine whether any arguable issue exists on appeal. Having done so, we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In February 2020, after Outlaw waived his right to a preliminary hearing, the Mendocino County District Attorney filed an information alleging that Outlaw had committed felony corporal injury on a specified
1
person, S.K., on or about March 18, 2019 (Pen. Code,1 § 273.5, subd. (a), count one); felony assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury upon S.K. on or about that same date (§ 245, subd. (a)(4), count two); felony corporal injury on a specified person, S.K., on or about February 7, 2020 (§ 273.5, subd. (a), count three); four felony counts of resisting an executive officer by force or threat in connection with the February 2020 incident (§ 69, subd. (a), counts four through seven); one misdemeanor count of resisting, obstructing, or delaying an officer in connection with the March 2019 incident (§ 148, subd. (a)(1), count eight); and misdemeanor violation of a court order to prevent domestic violence (§ 273.6, subd. (a), count nine). In addition, it was alleged that Outlaw had previously suffered a strike conviction in November 2007 for felony driving under the influence (§ 23153, subd, (a)), with two admitted great bodily injury enhancements (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)). Finally, the information stated that Outlaw had been convicted previously of two or more felonies within the meaning of sections 1170.12 and 667. The charges stemmed from two separate incidents of domestic violence against the same victim.2 Police officers responded to a 911 hang up call in the early morning of March 18, 2019, in which a female could be heard crying and screaming. They found an apparent blood mark on the motel room door. Outlaw answered an officer’s knock but refused to produce the female occupant, attempting instead to close the door. After the officer kicked in the door, S.K.—who had been in a dating relationship with Outlaw since May 2018—was discovered crying and “visibly upset” on the floor. She had red
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)