In re O.P. CA4/2
Filed 3/4/21 In re O.P. CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
In re O.P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
THE PEOPLE, E074935 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. J277069) v. OPINION O.P.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Pamela P. King,
Judge. Affirmed.
Tonja R. Torres, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
1
Between November 2018 and June 2020, minor O.P. admitted to three counts of
second degree vehicular burglary and four probation violations. On March 16, 2020, after
O.P.’s 18th birthday and following a contested disposition hearing, the court declined to
order terminal disposition, and instead continued him as a ward, ordered formal
probation, and required he spend 138 days in juvenile hall. Minor remained a ward of the
court until being discharged in August 2020. The court also declined to seal his record as
he failed to successfully complete probation.
O.P. appeals the court’s March 16, 2020 order. His attorney filed a brief informing
this court they were unable to identify any errors and asking us to perform an
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)