People v. Stimson CA2/8

Filed 3/2/21 P. v. Stimson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

THE PEOPLE, B305716

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. MA071367 v. & MA072453)

NIGEL MARQUEE STIMPSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Shannon Knight, Judge. Affirmed.

Christopher J. Bou Saeed, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

____________________

Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we review this appeal following orders revoking probation. We affirm. In November 2017, Nigel Marquee Stimpson entered into a plea deal that encompassed five matters: two felonies and three misdemeanors. Our record contains little about the misdemeanors. We know one of them was a domestic violence case that generated a protective order against Stimpson. The two felony matters are Case No. MA071367 and Case No. MA072453. Case No. MA071367 involves a single count for forgery of a prescription. Case No. MA072453 involves a single count for second degree robbery. At the preliminary hearing, a security guard employed by a grocery store testified Stimpson put a bottle of alcohol into his backpack, left the store without paying for it, and ran away when confronted. Stimpson pleaded no contest to both felonies. The trial court sentenced Stimpson to the upper term of five years in state prison for Case No. MA072453 and a concurrent midterm of two years in county jail for Case No. MA071367. The court then suspended execution of both sentences, put Stimpson on probation for five years, and imposed various conditions on his probation. Stimpson had agreed to probation conditions in MA072453 that related to his misdemeanor matters in exchange for termination of these matters, and the court accepted the parties’ agreement. One of these conditions required Stimpson to obey a protective order to stay away from a woman identified in our record as Stimpson’s wife, Renetta Walters. The court later