People v. Heggins CA2/1

Filed 2/25/21 P. v. Heggins CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE, B306107

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA149741) v.

AUNDRAE RENE HEGGINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John J. Lonergan, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. Justin Behravesh, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent. ____________________________

Defendant Aundrae Rene Heggins appeals from the judgment of conviction. Heggins’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), identifying no issues and requesting that this court review the record and determine whether any arguable issue exists on appeal. We have reviewed the record, conclude the record reveals no arguable issue on appeal, and thus affirm.

BACKGROUND Defendant threatened to kill Brandon Millan if Millan did not give defendant his bicycle. An unidentified passerby alerted defendant to a patrol vehicle, and defendant then walked away. Millan identified defendant after the incident and in court. After the incident, sheriff department employees located defendant, arrested him, handcuffed him, and placed him in the back of a sheriff vehicle. As a sheriff department employee transported defendant to inmate reception, defendant kicked the window of the vehicle and jumped out of the vehicle. Defendant rolled on the freeway and then started running. The cost to repair the vehicle was $590.39. The jury convicted defendant of attempted second degree robbery and found the allegation that defendant personally used a firearm within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivision (b) not true. The jury found defendant not guilty of the crime of possession of a firearm by a felon. The jury found defendant guilty of vandalism and that the amount of damage exceeded $400. The jury also found defendant guilty of escaping from arrest. Defendant admitted suffering two prior serious felony convictions. (See Pen. Code, §§ 667, subd. (d)(1) & 1192.7, subd. (c).)