People v. Leon CA2/5
Filed 1/14/21 P. v. Leon CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
THE PEOPLE, B304478
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA085870) v.
ROBERT LEON,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Bruce F. Marrs, Judge. Affirmed. Leonard J. Klaif, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Zee Rodriguez, Charles S. Lee, Idan Ivri, and Paul S. Thies, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Robert Leon appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Senate Bill No. 1437 (Senate Bill 1437) and Penal Code section 1170.951 petition for resentencing. We affirm.
II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A jury convicted defendant of attempted willful, deliberate, premeditated murder. (§§ 664/187, subd. (a).) The jury found true the allegation that the offense was committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang within the meaning of section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(C). The trial court sentenced defendant to life in prison with parole eligibility after 15 years. (People v. Sotelo et al. (Jan. 24, 2011, B219799) [nonpub. opn.].) On October 11, 2019, defendant filed a petition for resentencing pursuant to Senate Bill 1437 and section 1170.95. Under penalty of perjury, defendant declared that a complaint, information, or indictment had been filed against him that allowed the prosecution to proceed under a theory of felony murder or murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine; he was convicted of first or second degree murder under the felony murder rule or the natural and probable consequences doctrine; and he could not now be convicted of first or second degree murder due to the January 1, 2019, changes to sections 188 and 189. Defendant further declared that he was convicted of first degree felony murder and could no longer be convicted of that
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)