In re B.B. CA2/6

California Court of Appeal Dec 21, 2020 No. B305540Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that the appellant forfeited his challenge to the reasonableness of his probation conditions by failing to raise a timely objection in the juvenile court.

Issues

Whether the appellant forfeited his challenge to probation conditions by failing to object in the trial court.

Disposition. affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The failure to object to a probation condition as unreasonable forfeits the claim on appeal.”

“Because B.B. did not object to the probation conditions during the disposition hearing, he forfeited his claim on appeal.”

Filed 12/21/20 In re B.B. CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re B.B., a Person Coming 2d Crim. No. B305540 Under the Juvenile Court (Super. Ct. No. TJ23162) Law. (Los Angeles County)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

B.B.,

Defendant and Appellant.

B.B. appeals from an order adjudicating him a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602). The juvenile court found true the allegation that B.B. committed second degree robbery (Pen. Code,1 § 211) and that he personally used a firearm

1 Further unspecified statutory references are to the Penal Code.

(§ 12022.53, subd. (b)). The court ordered B.B. to be placed at a camp community program for five to seven months with a maximum term of confinement of 15 years and eight months. B.B. contends the juvenile court erred when it imposed certain probation conditions related to graffiti and tagging. We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Prior Offenses In December 2018, B.B. was arrested for stealing property and a gun from a car. He admitted allegations that he possessed a firearm (§ 29610) and tampered with the contents of a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10852). The juvenile court sustained the petition as to those allegations. In March 2019, B.B. was arrested after driving a stolen car, which contained a gun. After B.B. admitted the allegations in the petition, the juvenile court sustained the petition on the driving and taking the vehicle without consent allegation (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)). In June 2019, police officers arrested B.B. after identifying him as a suspect in a robbery. B.B. took an individual’s phone after threatening the individual. B.B. admitted the allegation that he committed attempted second degree robbery. (§§ 664/211.) The juvenile court sustained the petition on the attempted robbery allegation and ordered B.B. home on probation. Current Offense In February 2020, B.B. and a companion approached an individual, who was leaving a marijuana dispensary. B.B. said, “Hey, give me everything you got.” When the individual did not give him anything, B.B. pulled out a gun and pointed it at the

In re B.B. CA2/6

AI Brief

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

GILBERT, P. J. PERREN, J.

AI Brief