People v. Edwards CA2/2
Filed 11/25/20 P. v. Edwards CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE, B302603
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA146410) v.
KHARI ANTONIO EDWARDS,
Defendant and Appellant.
THE COURT:
Khari Antonio Edwards (defendant) appeals from a judgment entered upon a plea of no contest to human trafficking. Counsel was appointed to represent defendant in connection with this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an “Opening Brief” in which no arguable issues are raised, and asks this court for an independent review of the record as required by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). On September 9, 2020, we advised defendant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues for us to consider.
That time has elapsed, and defendant has submitted no brief or letter. We have reviewed the entire record and find no arguable issues. We thus affirm the judgment. Defendant was charged by felony complaint with (1) human trafficking of a minor for a commercial sex act by force or fear (Pen. Code, § 236.1, subd. (c)(2))1; (2) human trafficking to commit another crime (§ 236.1, subd. (b)); (3) unlawful sexual intercourse (§ 261.5, subd. (d)); and (4) oral copulation of a person under 18 (§ 288a, subd. (b)(1)). The complaint also alleged that defendant’s 2014 robbery conviction constituted a “strike” within the meaning of our Three Strikes Law (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(j), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)), for which he served a prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). On May 8, 2019, the People amended the complaint to add a charge of (5) human trafficking of a minor (§ 236.1, subd. (c)(1).) That same day, defendant entered into a plea agreement in which he would enter a plea to the human trafficking to commit another crime and human trafficking of a minor charges in exchange for an agreed-upon prison sentence of 21 years and four months. Defendant then pled no contest to those two counts and admitted his prior strike conviction. Defense counsel stipulated to the factual basis for the plea. The trial court sentenced defendant to the agreed-upon sentence of 21 years and four months in state prison. Specifically, the court imposed a sentence of 16 years on the human trafficking to commit another crime count (comprised of a low term base sentence of eight years, doubled due to the prior
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)