In re C.C. CA2/6
Filed 10/27/20 In re C.C. CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
IN RE C.C., A Person Coming 2d Juv. No. B298675 Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Super. Ct. No. YJ39637) (Los Angeles County) _____________________________
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
C.C.,
Defendant and Appellant.
C.C. appeals the juvenile court’s order sustaining a juvenile warship petition after finding true allegations that appellant had committed the offenses of possession of a firearm by a minor
(Pen. Code,1 § 29610), possession of live ammunition by a minor (§ 29650), and resisting, delaying, or obstructing a peace officer (§ 148, subd. (a)(1). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602.) The court also found true allegations that the crimes were committed for the benefit of, at the direction or, or in association with a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (d)). The court declared appellant a ward and ordered that he be removed from his parents’ custody and placed in the Rites of Passage program. Appellant asks us to independently review the record on his Pitchess2 motion. He also contends the matter must be remanded for the court to set his maximum period of confinement. The People concede the latter point and we shall order the matter remanded accordingly. Otherwise, we affirm. STATEMENT OF FACTS On the night of January 1, 2019, Los Angeles Police Officers Brandon Mendoza and his partner Joseph Roberts were on patrol when they saw appellant with three other young men in Oakwood Park known to be in the territory of the “Shoreline Crips.” It was later learned that appellant and his comrades were members of the “Culver City Boys” gang. One of the young men was holding a can of spray paint. When they saw the police car, they began walking toward their vehicle. The individual who was holding the can of spray paint disposed of it in a trash can. Appellant, who was wearing a red sweater, got into the front passenger seat of the vehicle. After the vehicle drove away, Officer Mendoza attempted to effect a traffic stop and activated his lights and siren. The
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)