Trans World Sourcing v. Prend CA4/2

Filed 10/14/20 Trans World Sourcing v. Prend CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

TRANS WORLD SOURCING, INC., Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, E072163

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1603278)

ROGER PREND, OPINION Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Randall S. Stamen,

Judge. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

Law Office of Armand Tinkerian and Armand Tinkerian for Plaintiff, Cross-

defendant and Appellant, Trans World Sourcing, Inc.

Thompson & Colegate and Susan Knock Beck for Defendant, Cross-complainant

and Respondent, Roger Prend.

Defendant Roger Prend prevailed on his motion for summary judgment in this

action. Plaintiff Trans World Sourcing, Inc. (Trans World) moved to vacate the judgment

1

and the order granting summary judgment, and the court denied that motion. Prend

moved for attorney fees and costs, and the trial court granted that motion. Trans World

appeals from both orders. We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

BACKGROUND

Trans World leased a commercial warehouse from Prend to store its inventory of